Well here we are. I started writing this with this vague idea of an NBA Dark Ages and little idea of what that actually meant. Since then I’ve ranked the best players of that era from the 39th best all the way through the 11th best and I think the idea of what makes a great Dark Ages player is becoming abundantly clear. For example, before I started writing this piece, I didn’t even know how anti-Dark Agey Steve Nash was. I didn’t even know I disliked Steve Nash, and I definitely didn’t know I considered Steve Nash an overrated NBA player. I’m sorry Steve Nash, but passing is so modern-NBA and it’s boring, that’s why Jamal Crawford and Monta Ellis and Lou Williams and the entire Phoenix Suns roster are so awesome, because they understand this, and they either never played in the Dark Ages, or were too young and raw to matter.
I’ll say it right here right now, Steve Nash would be playing this year if he had spent the entire summer watching Jamal Crawford highlight tapes on The Youtube instead of rehabbing his back, or practicing basketball, or whatever else he was doing. He should have sat down and studied the greatness of Crawford. That’s what I do every day and I now have as good of a chance as playing in the NBA this year as Steve Nash. That, my friends, is a lack of dedication to the Dark Ages from Steve Nash.
More on Crawford though, a man who has been my favorite NBA player for the last three years and a man who spent the first five years of his career being groomed by the Dark Ages, but ultimately was too Dark Agey even for the Dark Ages. It got me thinking, what players in today’s game should have spent their whole prime in the Dark Ages? If you are unaware of Crawford’s game, which has never really changed, he has two amazing skills. The first skill is that he has arguably the best handle in the whole league, and the second is that Jamal Crawford can score. I mean, he can really really really score. He might be the most talented man in the world, not named Kobe Bean Bryant, at putting round objects through a 10-foot high metal hoop. Jamal Crawford lives and breathes scoring. A quick follow on The Twitter will reveal that Crawford has few interests besides basketball. When the season is over, he plays in his summer league and any other pick-up game he can find. He is a Rafer Alston with the ability to average 20 ppg off the friggin bench! If I had a time machine the first thing I would do is go back to 1975, seduce and then impregnate Crawford’s momma. Then he could have played his prime in the Dark Ages. The world would have been a better place.
Rounding out the current NBA players starting lineup that belonged in the Dark Ages:
G: Monta Ellis: A more efficient shooter and better passer than he gets credit for, but lezbehonest, this is a man who was born to score. He averaged over 38 ppg his senior year in high school, including a 72 point game. Monta belonged in the Dark Ages.
F: Josh Smith: Irrationally jacking 3’s is an amazingly Dark Agey thing to do, just ask the legendary Antoine Walker.
F: JaVale McGee: Personalities ruled in the Dark Ages…so did underdeveloped skills coupled with freakish athleticism. JaVale McGee will become President of the NBA Players Union and have his own talk show some day; that’s unrelated, but it will happen, just watch.
G: Kembance Stephalker: He’s young and unproven, but man his shooting percentages are vintage Dark Ages. I’m pretty sure they stopped keeping track of shooting percentages during the Dark Ages, it was a useless stat to use during the era. Kembance would have thrived.
Ok, it’s time for the moment we have all been waiting for, the definitive list of the 10 greatest NBA players of the Dark Ages(minus the top five). So take a deep breath, find a comfortable seat, and keep some ibuprofen close, because your head is about to explode.
10. Vince Carter
-1 2nd team, 1 3rd team=+3
-6 all star games=+6
-6 seasons 20+ pts=+6
-Name rec=+6
-Career pt=+8
Coolness=+9
-Total=38
Vinsanity was the shit.
I’ve already mentioned the 2000 dunk contest, but it’s worth discussing again, because it has everything to do with why Vinsanity is the man. I have foggy memories of watching Kobe and Steve Francis win their respective dunk contests before Vince, but this was the first one I have a clear memory of watching on the television, and nothing has compared to it in the years since. Calling it a dunk contest isn’t really accurate, because no one else ever had a chance and all the other contestants clearly knew this. I imagine Stevie Francis didn’t even bother planning out his title-defending, he was just more concerned with finding the best view to watch Vince, as was every other fan and NBA player in the stands. There was just a palpable electricity surrounding that dunk contest, a level of hype only matched since by the Blake Griffin dunk contest debut that failed miserably to live up to that hype.
And that’s the thing about it, hype is usually not lived up to because it is unrealistic. If it’s realistic, it isn’t really even hype, it’s anticipation. The Vinsanity Dunk Contest was so iconic and memorable because he didn’t just live up to the unrealistic hype surrounding the event, he surpassed it.
One of the most frustrating parts of dunk contests of recent memory is the misses. Many of us remember Birdman’s ill-fated dunk contest attempts, as well as the ridiculous Nate Robinson over Spud Webb double digit failures that still somehow earned him the win over the much more efficient Andre Iguodala that year. Well, Vince missed exactly one dunk in 2000. One, and even that was more Tracy McGrady’s fault as the passer. That’s hard to believe now, but back then the players understood the importance of execution. It’s all in good fun to try the most high difficulty dunks, but if you know there is a good chance you will miss it, just don’t try it, because the Dunk Contest above all else is a show, and that show becomes a whole lot less interesting when it takes a player ten attempts to complete one dunk. I’m not saying that Vince wasn’t interested in high difficulty dunks, but you can tell he had a plan that he knew he could execute, and that the dunks in that plan were enough to easily carry him to victory. That smirk he had on his face the whole time says it all; Vince knew the fans were there to see him put on a show, and he knew he could and would give the people what they wanted.
As for the actual dunks, here is how I would rank them.
1. The first dunk(360 windmill). This had the highest degree of difficulty, and also the perfect exhibition of why Vince Carter was such a great dunker. Watch the way he just kind of glides through the air; there is no wasted motion, no lack of extension. He doesn’t start his spin too early and he slams it with authority. This is a high difficulty dunk from the get-go, and as Kenny Smith said immediately following, “it’s over”.
2. This one is a tie between the third dunk(takes a lob from McGrady and goes between the legs) and the fourth dunk(the astonishing elbow dunk). The thing about Vince is he understood that every great dunker must not only be able to execute difficult dunks, but also have creativity in the dunks they choose. Sometimes, it is more important to perform a dunk no one else has ever done or seen before, regardless of the difficulty. The elbow dunk was just that as far as creativity. Looking back at it, it’s hilarious how confused the crowd is on this dunk because they missed the fact that he was hanging from his elbow. This dunk was so amazing because it was so easily replicable, yet no one had ever considered doing it before. Also, it became the go to dunk on 8-foot hoops for white kids across the country. This dunk was everything.
3. I’m going to go with the second dunk here, the behind the basket reverse spin windmill. Don’t get it twisted folks, this dunk is hard to accomplish and combined both creativity and degree of difficulty. All of a sudden, future dunk contest contestants began to expand the scope of where on the floor they could dunk from.
4. The worst dunk, or should I say the least good dunk of the night, was Vince’s finishing two-handed dunk from the free-throw line, but as almost every player who attempts this dunk does, Vince launched a little closer to the basket than intended. The two-handed part of it is amazing, and the contest was pretty much over by this time, but this one left a little bit to be desired. Vince just needed to complete a dunk really, and he had probably used up his bag of tricks, but when you have the crowd in a frenzy like he did before this dunk, you better make damn sure you take off before that free throw line.
Oh, and Vince was also a pretty damn good basketball player during this time period. Like Blake Griffin today, people have tried to chip away at Vince’s legacy by claiming he was a one-trick pony only good at dunking. Like Blake Griffin, this was just simply never true. Vince averaged 20+ PPG for 10 straight seasons; he was a true number one option on any average to slightly above average team. He also was never good enough to be a number one option on a championship caliber team, which is why he is a Dark Ages icon. Still playing(he’s on the Grizz now fyi), we can only hope Vince plays forever. I don’t know if Vince Carter is a Hall of Famer, but we will always have Vinsanity, and that unforgettable dunk contest.
9. Chris Webber
-1 1st team, 3 2nd teams, 1 3rd team=+10
-1x rbs leader=+1
-5 seasons 20+ pts=+5
-5 seasons 10+ rebs=+5
-4 all star games=+4
-1 season 2+ blks=+1
-Name rec.=+6
-Career pt=+7
-Coolness=+7
-Total=46
So I’m slightly out of breath after talking about Vince Carter for so long, and most of what I have to say about Chris Webber invloves the amazing Kings teams he played for during this time that I already covered with Peja, so I’ll keep this short and sweet. Chris Webber could absolutely be the number one option on a championship caliber team. How do I know this? Because those Kings teams were championship caliber, and he was the number one option, though you could also make a strong argument for Scott Pollard.
Webber could post-up, he could shoot, and he could pass. He just couldn’t stay healthy. Webber never played a full 82 game season, and because I fully believe all injuries and pain are mental and can be prayed away, this hurt Webber’s ranking. Helping his ranking, however, is the fact that Webber is a solid part of the TNT NBA analyst team and seems like a cool guy to kick it with. Also, his shoe, the DaDa’s, were hysterically ambitious in their color scope.
I never saw Webber on the Fab Five, but I saw Webber on the Sacramento Kings, and that Webber could ball. He fully deserves the #9 spot on this list.
8. Tracy McGrady
-2 1st teams, 2 2nd teams, 1 3rd team=+11
-5 all star games=+5
-2x scoring champ=+2
-5 seasons 20+ pts=+5
-Name rec=+7
-Career pt=+8
-Coolness=+9
-Total=47
Tracy McGrady, on the other hand, seems a little low on this list. The #8 ranking comes off as slightly disrespectful to a player who was so incredibly Dark Agey in every way, but nonetheless here we are. If I could create one basketball player from scratch, Tracy McGrady is only behind LeBron in for what dimensions I would model my creation after. McGrady was 6’8” and impossibly long, he could handle and he could shoot, and he could make teammates better but that wasn’t necessarily his first concern. He’s famous for never having won a playoff series while being THE GUY, but that is entirely unfair to a man who always played better in the playoffs. Seriously, look up T-Mac’s numbers and tell me he’s to blame for never having won a playoff series. It’s ridiculous, especially considering those Magic teams he had to put on his back every single night. Please, name the second best player during T-Mac’s time in Orlando. Darrell Armstrong? A young Mike Miller? It’s a joke of an exercise, additionally hurt by the fact that Grant Hill couldn’t stay on the court.
The Rockets teams are a little harder to figure out, because they had some players, and Jeff Van Gundy was coaching them. At least, that’s what I thought, until I looked up those Rockets rosters. In McGrady’s time there with Yao, the third leading scorer on those Rockets teams is a hilarious list of “LMAO, this has to be a typo” guys:
’04-’05-Jim Jackson(who?)
’05-’06-Rafer Alston(it gets better…)
’06-’07-Rafer Alston(wait for it…)
’07-’08-Rafer Alston(#skiptomylou4evaaaa)
That is horrifying. Granted, none of those seasons fall within the Dark Ages, but McGrady’s lack of playoff success is a big part of his overall legacy and it just isn’t fair.
You know what absolutely should be part of his legacy? The T-Mac 2.
What a fucking awesome shoe. Everyone had a pair, literally(but not literally, just a lot of people had them). These shoes were awesome, primarily because they didn’t try to do too much. They definitely beat out the Kobe 2’s and the aforementioned DaDa’s, and though Iverson put out some awesome shoes, many were not basketball specific shoes. The T-Mac 2’s had no flaws.
Like his cousin Vince Carter, T-Mac’s Hall of Fame credentials are up in the air because of the way people look at and define the Dark Ages. He just couldn’t win in April, May, or June, and despite the fact that this is undoubtedly not his fault, it will hurt him. So will the fact that he dropped off so quickly and ungracefully. Vince became a role player, Kidd became a role player, Pierce became a role player, hell even Shaq stopped being the first or second option at the end of his career. But McGrady, like Kobe, was never built to take a reduced role, and when the injuries came and robbed him of his ‘number one option’ skills, his career was over just like that. Like many things in McGrady’s career, it’s unfair, and so is this ranking. But the Basketball Baby Jesus(new nickname I gave myself) has spoken and he’s not taking it back, as much as it hurts him because…
7. Ben Wallace
-2 2nd teams, 2 3rd teams=+6
-3x DPY=+6
-2x rebs leader=+2
-1x block leader=+1
-3 all star games=+3
-1 NBA Champ=+3
-5 seasons 10+ rebs=+5
-5 seasons 2+ blks=+5
-Name rec=+4
-Career pt=+9
-Coolness=+8
-Total=52
Ben Wallace was absolutely not a better player than Tracy McGrady. That sentence makes a lot of sense right? I mean, who out there is going to stump for Ben Wallace being a better player of the Dark Ages than Tracy McGrady? Any takers? Nobody? Fine I’ll do it.
Three-time defensive player of the year. Two times he led the league in rebounding and once in blocks. Yes, defense sucks and isn’t that fun and is totally not Dark Agey, but Ben Wallace made defense and rebounds and blocks cool.
Which brings us to the penultimate edition of Things Zane Finds Cool, sponsored by The Heem Teem: afros are always cool, nappy afros are even cooler, and nappy afros with a headband are the coolest; instigating fan-on-player brawls is awesome, as is being a 6’8” center.
Ben Wallace was very cool, but he was also extremely effective on those Detroit Pistons teams, including the championship one. Playing for Larry Brown is always cool because Larry Brown is the coolest. No, he couldn’t score, which I hate. Yes, that Pistons-Spurs series was awful and definitely marked the end of the Dark Ages. So in a way, Ben Wallace is directly responsible for the end of the Dark Ages, first for starting the Malice at the Palace and then for being a part of those horribly boring(aka team oriented) Pistons teams. If I had the power to do so, I would banish Ben Wallace from this list, but the Dark Ages are more powerful than the Basketball Baby Jesus(is it catching on yet?) and I am powerless to do so. Ben Wallace is your seventh best player of the Dark Ages.
6. Jason Kidd
-5 1st teams, 1 2nd team=+17
-5 time asst leader=+5
-2 seasons 10+ asst=+2
-5 all star games=+5
-5 seasons 2+ stls=+5
-Name rec.=+6
-Career pt=+10
-Coolness=+3
-Total=53
Five 1st teams in the Dark Ages!! That’s extremely impressive for a point guard. We’re getting into some rarefied space here, and Jason Kidd, one of the best point guards of all time was at his peak in the Dark Ages, but was Jason Kidd great? I don’t mean was he a great point guard(he was) or even, was he a great player(also true). I mean when we talk about the quote unquote GREATS in sports, we’re talking about the players you never witnessed, yet you know they are immortal symbols of greatness in their respective sports. Magic Johnson and Larry Bird are greats. Oscar Robertson is a great, Wilt Chamberlain is a great, and many more that everyone can agree “those were great players”. Then you have the ones that had great success and are well known players, but not every one can agree on their legacies. Already on this list I think that would include players like Karl Malone, Gary Payton, Paul Pierce and David Robinson. John Stockton and Hakeem Olajuwon I think could be considered to be greats, but then again maybe not, the fact that I’m not 100% sure probably means they aren’t.
Jason Kidd has the second most assists and the second most steals of all-time, trailing only Stockton in both categories. Like Stockton, he played in several NBA Finals without winning. Yet, like Stockton, his legacy may be marred by the fact that he was never an elite scorer night in and night out.
Unlike Stockton, Kidd never shot a good percentage from the field, always flirting with that mediocre 40% line. Also, unlike Stockton, Kidd was a great rebounder, maybe the best ever for a point guard. Think I’m lying? At the age of 34, Kidd averaged 8.2 rebounds per game. I know he’s 6’4” but that’s not exactly the most athletic 6’4” that ever flew after rebounds, making it all the more impressive.
Unfortunately, Kidd also got in trouble for beating his wife during this period, which drastically reduced his coolness. On top of that, Kidd got real bratty this past offseason and attempted a coup of the Brooklyn Nets front-office, only to bolt to become Milwaukee’s coach after he was rebuffed by the Nets management. Staging coups are cool, having a coup fail is decidedly super uncool. Not cool Jason(fuck Jason is such a cool name, though).